RFK Jr. argues Joe Biden is a much bigger menace to democracy than Donald Trump throughout CNN interview (Video)


Unbiased presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made an explosive argument suggesting that Joe Biden is a larger menace to American democracy than former President Donald Trump.

The assertion got here throughout an interview with CNN's Erin Burnett on “Erin Burnett Outfront.”

When Erin Burnett questioned RFK Jr.'s stance on threats to democracy, the environmental lawyer and political activist didn’t hesitate to talk out.

“However do you actually imagine that when individuals discuss in regards to the menace Trump poses to democracy, do you actually assume it's simply as dangerous for Biden?” Burnett requested.

RFK Jr. responded, “Pay attention, I can argue that President Biden is a big menace to democracy. That's as a result of President Biden is the primary candidate in historical past, the primary president in historical past to make use of federal companies to censor political speech, to censor his opponent.

Kennedy continued, referencing latest authorized victories: “I can say that as a result of I simply received a case within the federal appeals court docket and now in entrance of the Supreme Court docket. It exhibits that not solely me however Began censoring me too. 37 hours after taking the oath of workplace, he was censoring me. No president within the nation has ever finished this.”

He emphasised that the true menace to democracy just isn’t a president who questions election outcomes, however a president who makes use of the ability of workplace to suppress political dissent.

Kennedy accused Biden of pushing social media firms to open particular portals for federal companies just like the FBI, CIA, IRS, CISA and NIH to observe and censor political critics.

In a extra critical allegation, RFK Jr. claimed, “President Biden is the primary president in historical past to make use of his energy over the Secret Service to disclaim Secret Service safety to considered one of his political opponents for political causes. “


Final month, the U.S. Supreme Court docket heard arguments from The Gateway Pundit's Jim Hoft, the State of Missouri, the State of Louisiana, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Aaron Kheriati and Jill Hines (the “Free Speech Plaintiffs”). Arguments towards the Biden administration and a military of presidency companies.

Earlier than all appeals, the case initially started after the states of Missouri and Louisiana, joined by The Gateway Pundit and the opposite people talked about above, alleged that the Biden White Home and dozens of federal officers and companies had been conspiring and/or Or forcing social media firms like Fb, Twitter, and others to censor the speech of hundreds of thousands of Americans, particularly throughout COVID and earlier than and after the 2020 presidential election.

The proof clearly exhibits – and even Mark Zuckerberg admitted the FBI pressured Fb to take away the Hunter Biden laptop computer story – in true fascist style, the feds labored with Huge Tech or in any other case. Demanded that Huge Tech police speech with which they disagreed and which went towards government-approved celebration dogma.

Gateway Pundits and the opposite plaintiffs initially sought a preliminary injunction and had been in a position to receive a considerable quantity of proof in assist of that injunction.

Leave a Comment