[
The U.S. Supreme Courtroom agreed on Wednesday to listen to Trump's presidential immunity declare within the January 6 case from particular counsel Jack Smith in Washington, D.C., Gateway Pundit reported. It particularly addresses whether or not he can escape prices filed in opposition to him associated to the alleged rebel on the US Capitol.
The excessive court docket will hear oral arguments on expedited time the week of April 22 and ship a choice by the tip of the time period in or earlier than June.
As Jim Hoft famous earlier, the liberal media made a collection of idiotic feedback following the choice, notably on CNN and MSNBC. They will't bear the truth that Trump is doubtlessly going to prevail.
However the greatest meltdown comes from MSNBC's most infamous host: Rachel Maddow. She was a visitor on fellow leftist MSNBC anchor Chris Hay's present All In With Chris Hayes To present him an “evaluation” of the frequent sense determination.
He started his tirade by claiming that the choice proved that the Courtroom isn’t a rational actor and that Trump would by no means face trial. Maddow then hysterically claimed that if Trump received re-election, he would by no means depart workplace and would stay in energy for the remainder of his life to keep away from going to jail.
Watch:
NEW: Far-left MSNBC host Rachel Maddow is nervous herself and claims Donald Trump will keep in workplace for all times if elected in 2024.
I consider that MSNBC is basically only a madhouse.
“When (the Supreme Courtroom) basically guidelines that presidents are usually not exempt from… pic.twitter.com/HTvuWSVYUV
– Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) 29 February 2024
When you consider the Courtroom as a rational actor and a good individual, it seems that that was an unfair assumption, and it seems they're not like that.
The conclusion we will attain now based mostly on what he has accomplished with out ready for the decision is to make sure that Trump is not going to face trial. And after they basically rule that presidents are usually not immune from prosecution after they depart workplace, what that can inform Donald Trump, if he’s nonetheless president, is that he won’t ever lose the presidency. Can't depart.
If he’s voted out in 2028, he can not step down, and is welcome to commit any crime he desires, so long as he’s president, to disregard the outcomes of that election and stay in energy for the remainder of his life. , as a result of in any other case he should go to jail when he will get out.
However it was not full! She continued together with her outburst and accused the court docket of attempting to intervene within the election and act as Trump's “political buddy.”
Video:
“That is BS – you have been doing it as a evasive tactic to assist your political buddy,” says @madado On SCOTUS. “And your saying that that is one thing that the court docket must resolve as a result of that is one thing that’s unclear within the regulation is simply plain, apparent nonsense.” pic.twitter.com/v1NKDorzb0
– All In With Chris Hayes (@allinwithchris) 29 February 2024
It's clear what they're doing with the momentum right here…clearly pushing ahead all these circumstances the place Trump will stand for election, even earlier than we hear the decision in any of those circumstances. bought it.
However even the concept that immunity issues is an open query. Is that this actually an open query? What’s the most well-known pardon in American historical past? Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon as soon as he resigned and was a former president.
Why? Quote: “Because of sure acts or admissions made earlier than his resignation as President…Richard Nixon has develop into liable to doable impeachment. Whether or not he shall be prosecuted will depend upon the findings of the suitable grand jury and the discretion of the approved prosecutor.” it will depend on. “
The concept it's an open query, the concept that a president can by no means be prosecuted…an off-the-cuff examine of American historical past proves it fallacious. To just accept this concept they must say that the sky is inexperienced.
That is BS—you have been doing this as a sidestepping tactic to assist your political buddy. And your saying that that is one thing that the court docket must resolve on as a result of it’s one thing that’s unclear within the regulation is simply plain, apparent nonsense.