[
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Fischer v. United States on Tuesday and the statute at issue is 18 USC §1512(c)(2):
Whoever corrupts-
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates or conceals any record, document or other thing with intent to impair the integrity or availability of the thing for use in any official proceeding, or Tries to; Or
(2) Otherwise obstructs, influences or hinders any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be punished with a fine under this title or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 20 years, or both.
The Supreme Court is expected to rule on Fisher v. United States this summer, meaning hundreds of J6 cases could be overturned.
Biden's corrupt DOJ has charged over 300 J6ers under 18 USC §1512(c)(2). Additionally, two of the four charges against Trump in Jack Smith's D.C. case are conspiracy to obstruct, so the Supreme Court's decision could also destroy the special counsel's case against Trump.
Justice Clarence Thomas questions DOJ Solicitor General Elizabeth Preloger as she explains how the government impartially used the §1512(c)(2) statute to prosecute hundreds of J6 defendants for marching on the Capitol on January 6, 2021 Is using.
Justice Thomas pointed out that there have been several violent protests that have interfered with the proceedings (Kavanaugh hearings).
“There have been several violent protests which have interfered with the proceedings. Has the government applied this provision to other protests in the past and has this been the government's position throughout the life of the law?” Justice Thomas asked the DOJ lawyer.
Justice Thomas asked Preloger whether the government had ever used this provision for other protesters.
Preloger broke his back trying to explain to the Supreme Court why leftist protesters were not prosecuted like the January 6 defendants.
Audio:
Particular counsel Jack Smith advised he would ignore the obstruction legislation if the Supreme Courtroom overturns it this summer time.
Jack Smith advised he would discover a answer if the Supreme Courtroom overturns the 2 expenses towards Trump.
Smith claims the 'obstruction' expenses would nonetheless stand towards Trump as a result of the choice election certificates symbolize “paperwork” that have been fraudulently utilized in “official proceedings.”
These papers weren’t even despatched or signed by Trump!
Jack Smith isn't the one one threatening to bypass the Supreme Courtroom.
Final month, DC's US Lawyer Matthew Graves warned the US Supreme Courtroom – and the J6ers have been sentenced – for 18 USC §1512(c)(2), the 'obstruction' statute pending earlier than SCOTUS.