[
Making their approach to the US Supreme Courtroom, 38 navy chaplains are difficult Protection Secretary Lloyd Austin's authority to problem a 2021 COVID-19 vaccine mandate and its implementation, which has been largely criticized by these However those that have sought reduction are thought-about unlawful and unconstitutional. Its tyrannical enforcement.
The Gateway Pundit spoke to retired Vietnam Battle veteran and outstanding legal professional Arthur A. Schultz Sr. alvarado vs austin, On December 29, 2023, the pastors filed a petition with the Supreme Courtroom, difficult the dismissal of their claims of an injunction in opposition to continued retaliation for requesting non secular lodging by the Fourth Circuit Courtroom of Appeals and the dismissal of their constitutional and statutory rights by the District Courtroom, he mentioned. The rejection was challenged. Declare.
The Fourth Circuit held that the claims have been moot, which means the courts couldn’t grant any treatment as a result of the Military had allegedly fine-tuned the chaplain's considerations relating to the vaccine.
On March 21, the pastor filed an software for injunctive reduction within the Supreme Courtroom for his safety throughout and after the petition course of. A bunch of clergy is looking for an finish to retaliatory measures getting used in opposition to those that refuse to take the vaccine on the premise of non secular objection.
And on Friday, April 26, the Supreme Courtroom could have the chance to dam or block the insurance policies which are affecting the careers of those clergy.
“The Division of Protection (DOD) has dedicated treason in opposition to Congress by not returning these chaplains to their pre-mandate standing in accordance with Congress's December 22, 2023, order revoking the mandate,” Schultz mentioned. In keeping with Schultz, “The mandate did nothing greater than try to purge those that believed in conscience by violating the First and Fifth Amendments and the statutory protections of all service members.
“All the principles have been modified,” he mentioned. “There was no intention to offer any non secular lodging, (and) this could shake each citizen's confidence within the navy management.”
In keeping with Schultz, “The volunteer military is at risk of being destroyed by those that don’t have any respect for the regulation or people, particularly non secular freedom, and that is illustrated in our case.” He hopes the Supreme Courtroom will intervene and “do its responsibility to uphold the regulation.”
Schultz requested, “If the Supreme Courtroom primarily says your conscience doesn't matter or if the Courtroom ignores the blatant falsehoods of our navy leaders and willfully disregards what Congress has mentioned the DOD ought to do.” If it ignores you, which establishment will you flip to?”
In keeping with him, “Revocation of the mandate ought to imply restoring navy personnel to the place they have been in earlier than the mandate was issued, and this has not been performed.” “One of many major points in our case is whether or not the Secretary of Protection can deceive Congress and the courts with out accountability,” he mentioned.
After rescinding vaccine mandates, “antagonistic motion” must be faraway from the information of these requesting non secular lodging. “However that's not true,” Schultz mentioned. Whereas disciplinary actions such because the Normal Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) have been dropped, he identified that “the Secretary has not returned our chaplains and others to the established order.”
“Now we have individuals who have failed promotions twice due to poor health stories obtained after submitting non secular lodging requests,” he mentioned, (noting that) promotions beneath the grade of lieutenant colonel or commander within the Navy Due to two failures of this it’s important to face isolation on the will of the federal government.”
“Now we have pastors whose stories throughout COVID assure they won’t be promoted,” Schultz mentioned. He mentioned, “One in all our chaplains had his profession destroyed through the 'voluntary' part of the vaccine, as a result of he questioned his commander about telling troopers that the vaccine was voluntary after which firing them for not volunteering. Was punished for.” “However that chaplain's job was to advise the commander on ethical and moral points.”
Schultz additionally identified, “DOD has not been challenged on the truth that individuals have been harm by low proficiency stories, missed education, and so forth., (apart from) all of this stuff are lined by Part 533 (of the Nationwide Protection Authorization Act).” Are prohibited (NDAA).”
He argued, “What the mandate reveals and what we problem is a whole disregard for the regulation.”
“Even now, the Secretary refuses to confess that something was improper,” Schultz mentioned, including, “If Congress mentioned 'Cancel,' then the Secretary's job is to salute and say, 'Sure, Congress,' then Examine the harm that has been performed and do one thing to repair it.”
However based on Schultz, Austin has not performed this. “Thus, his insubordination and mendacity to Congress is a matter that may and must be addressed by the courts,” he mentioned. “In any other case, woe to us as a nation.”
Schultz shared, “In any case, the best to conscience is integral to who we’re as a nation and the First Modification, and this administration is doing one thing that has by no means been performed earlier than.” “(It) is to put oneself within the place of God because the supply of authority that determines proper and improper, and good and evil.”
“I deeply perceive that America's combating women and men are a treasure and a blessing,” Schultz mentioned. “The American combating males are distinctive, (as a result of) they’re the mainstay in finishing up the final word acknowledged objective of making the Structure, “to protect the blessings of liberty for themselves and their posterity.”
For him, “the phrase 'blessing' isn’t a political or authorized time period.” Moderately, he mentioned, “the time period displays the truth that our Founders knew that our liberty was given to us as a present by divine windfall, to which they appealed within the Declaration of Independence – with out military, with out navy. A daring assertion made by a individuals with no arms trade, no finance, and no associates besides divine windfall to whom they appealed.”
“Their conscience compelled them to oppose a tyrant who denied the freedoms and rights to which they’d grown accustomed and which have been assured of their legal guidelines and historical past, which they believed have been Rights come from the divine Creator,” Schultz mentioned, including, “Freedom of conscience is important to each First Modification proper.”
As for chaplains in as we speak's navy, he mentioned, “their conscience is shaped by belief and guarded by Part 533 (of the NDAA), which Mr. Austin ignored…a critical violation of the general public belief.”
“The clergy performed vital roles in our wrestle for independence,” Schultz shared. “The British referred to as them the Black Robes Regiment.” Reflecting on this, he mentioned, “How lucky that when once more now we have clergy in uniform defending 'the blessings of liberty for us and our posterity.'
Schultz prays for a good determination by the Supreme Courtroom, which acknowledges that the case isn’t meritless and strengthens the general public's confidence within the nation's courts as they implement the rule of regulation for all, together with the federal government.