[
Within the late fifteenth century, when the Italian Renaissance artist Leonardo da Vinci accomplished “Vitruvian Man” – certainly one of his most well-known work, which depicts the proportions of the human physique – he wouldn’t have guessed that it could possibly be made cheaply. Might be reproduced on pocket book, espresso. Mugs, T-shirts, aprons and even puzzles.
Centuries later, the Italian authorities and German puzzle maker Ravensburger are battling over who has the rights to breed the “Vitruvian Man” and revenue from it.
On the middle of the controversy is Italy's Cultural Heritage and Panorama Code, which was adopted in 2004 and permits cultural establishments resembling museums to request concession charges and funds for business reproductions of cultural properties such because the “Vitruvian Man”.
That code is opposite to EU legislation, which states that works within the public area (resembling “Vitruvian Man”) will not be topic to copyright.
For greater than a decade, Ravensburger offered a 1,000-piece puzzle with the picture of the well-known portray. However in 2019, the Italian authorities and the Gallery dell'Accademia in Venice, the place the well-known work and different da Vinci items are on show, used the Italian code to cease Ravensburger from promoting the puzzle and demand it pay licensing charges. .
Ravensburger refused, and later argued that the Italian Code didn’t apply outdoors Italy.
In 2022, a Venice courtroom ordered the corporate to pay a advantageous of 1,500 euros (or about $1,630) to the federal government and the Gallerie dell'Accademia for every day it delayed cost.
However final month, the authorized battle took a flip when a German courtroom sided with Ravensburger, ruling that the corporate doesn’t must pay and that Italy's cultural heritage code doesn’t apply outdoors its borders. The courtroom stated the Italian code violates European legislation that standardizes copyright safety for 70 years after the artist's dying. (Da Vinci has been lifeless for 505 years.)
The German courtroom dominated, “The Italian State doesn’t have the regulatory energy to implement it outdoors Italian territory.” “The opposite view violates the sovereignty of particular person states and may due to this fact be rejected.”
However Italy has continued to push again. An Italian authorities spokesman informed an Italian information outlet final week that the German determination was “uncommon” and that the federal government would problem it earlier than “each nationwide, worldwide and Group courtroom.”
Italy's tradition ministry didn’t reply to a number of requests for remark.
Ravensburger spokesman Heinrich Huenttelmann stated in an announcement Tuesday that the corporate is involved with the events concerned and is trying to resolve the battle.
Ravensburger stopped promoting the puzzle worldwide amid the authorized battle, Mr. Huenttelman stated, however a fast Google search revealed that comparable puzzles made by different corporations are nonetheless out there on-line.
Eleonora Rosati, an Italian-qualified lawyer and professor of mental property legislation at Stockholm College, stated Italian authorities have been trying to concurrently defend the nation's cultural heritage and monetize it.
Ms. Rosati stated corporations inside and outdoors Italy that use items of Italian cultural heritage on merchandise could need to act with warning. He stated Italian authorities in 2014 had gone after an Illinois-based gun maker for utilizing the picture of Michelangelo's statue of David to advertise a rifle.
“I don’t assume this German determination is the final phrase on this matter, and certainly everybody utilizing pictures of Italian cultural heritage will need to assess the chance they face in doing so,” Ms Rosati stated. . “For the time being, the scenario has turn into fairly heated.”
However Italy's zealous strategy to defending culturally important works could backfire, based on Geraldine Johnson, professor of artwork historical past on the College of Oxford.
“The consequence could also be that professional corporations that may produce high-quality objects depicting prestigious Italian artefacts will flip to non-Italian objects,” Ms Johnson stated, noting that That such a change might cut back the affect of Italian tradition on a worldwide scale. Whereas unlawful counterfeits proceed to be made cheaply with pictures thought-about unlawful by Italian courts.
“This iconic scene wouldn’t appear to be in the most effective pursuits of enhancing Italy’s international standing and relevance by means of the ‘delicate’ energy of creativeness,” she stated.