[
The Supreme Court docket has declined to listen to the case of an Indiana couple who misplaced custody of their “transgender” teenage son due to his refusal to make use of feminine pronouns.
The court docket dismissed the case with out remark or giving any motive.
As Gateway Pundit beforehand reported, Mary and Jeremy Cox, who’re Catholic, opted to deliver their son to remedy when he determined he wished to have a lady in 2019.
NEW: Catholic Indiana couple appeals to the Supreme Court docket after their baby was taken away from them after they refused to consult with him by their most well-liked pronouns.
Complete insanity.
In 2021, the Indiana Division of Youngsters Providers investigated mother and father Mary and Jeremy Cox and later… pic.twitter.com/XsFRBKoadn
– Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) 21 February 2024
Beckett Authorized, which is representing the Cox household, defined in a press launch, “Due to their spiritual perception that God created human beings with immutable gender – male or feminine – they’re free to cope with pronouns and their biology. The Coxes additionally believed she wanted assist for underlying psychological well being considerations, together with an consuming dysfunction.
“To deal with each points, they supplied therapeutic care for his or her baby's gender dysphoria and scheduled appointments with a specialist to assist him along with his consuming dysfunction. In 2021, Indiana started investigating the Coxes after a report that they weren’t referring to their baby by his most well-liked gender identification. Indiana then eliminated the teenager from his mother and father' custody and positioned him in a house that will verify his most well-liked identification.
The state didn’t discover proof of abuse – however claimed the couple's non-acceptance of their son's gender identification was dangerous to the kid's psychological well being.
“If it will possibly occur in Indiana, it will possibly occur wherever. Eradicating a baby from loving mother and father due to their spiritual beliefs, that are shared by thousands and thousands of Individuals, violates the legislation, parental rights and fundamental human decency, mentioned Lori Windham, vice chairman and senior counsel at Beckett. It’s an insult. “If the Supreme Court docket doesn't take up this case, what number of occasions will this occur to different households?”
In an announcement responding to the Supreme Court docket's rejection, the Cox household mentioned, “We are able to't change the previous, however we are going to proceed to battle for a future the place mother and father of religion can dwell with out the worry of state authorities flattening their doorways.” To have the ability to care for our youngsters.” ,
“We at all times defend mother and father’ rights and non secular freedom,” Indiana Lawyer Common Todd Rokita mentioned in an announcement. Neither we nor the Indiana courts acknowledge that the State could take away a baby due to the father or mother's spiritual beliefs, views about gender identification, or something of the like.
Rokita claimed that the woman's consuming dysfunction was the premise for her removing.