[
Techno Fog by Substack:
The transcripts of President Biden's interviews with Particular Counsel Robert Hur have been launched as we speak in anticipation of Hur's testimony earlier than the Home Judiciary Committee. Interviews cowl two days: October 8, 2023 and October 9, 2023.
And already, the media has seized on a line of assault towards Hur: that Biden was not delusional concerning the yr of his son's dying, that Biden was forthright and forthright and that Hur denied Biden's statements and his mind-set. was misrepresented.
However it isn’t true.
Actually, the transcripts present Biden scuffling with primary details. The yr his son Beau died. The yr he left workplace. The yr Trump was elected. Right here's a quick excerpt exhibiting all these points:
PRESIDENT BIDEN: And, so what was occurring – what month did Beau die? Oh my God, Might 30 –
Ms. Cotton: 2015.
Unidentified male speaker: 2015.
President Biden: Did he die in 2015?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE SPEAKER: This was Might 2015.
President Biden: It was 2015.
Mr. Bauer: Or I'm unsure concerning the month, sir, however I feel it was the yr.
Mr. Krickbaum: That’s right, Mr Chairman. it –
PRESIDENT BIDEN: And what occurred within the meantime is that – and Trump bought elected in November 2017?
Unidentified male speaker: 2016.
Unidentified male speaker: '16.
President Biden: '16, 2016, okay. So – why do I’ve 2017 right here?
Mr. Siskel: That's if you left workplace in January 2017.
That doesn't clarify Biden's confusion. Over the course of two pages of transcripts, Biden finds himself forgetting necessary dates and requiring the help of his legal professionals to make it by way of the interview.
However this isn’t the one instance. Listed here are extra excerpts:
Mr. Hur: Okay. Do you will have any thought the place these things may need been earlier than it was taken to the storage?
President Biden: Properly, if it have been 2013 – when did I cease being vice chairman?
Ms. Cotton: 2017.
,
President Biden discussing bins of supplies: “In 2009, am I nonetheless the vice chairman?” (His legal professionals needed to reply in a whisper.)
Hur's report, which we analyzed upon launch, additionally supplied particulars on the possession of categorised paperwork in Biden's properties and workplace. Hur's primary conclusion was that Biden knowingly retained categorised paperwork at his Delaware house. Whereas Biden escaped legal costs for various causes (for starters, his age and dementia), Hur's report was clear that Biden knew these paperwork have been categorised.
Notably, Biden had categorised paperwork in his pocket book at his house. Biden was on tape telling his ghostwriter that the notebooks “may very well be categorised.” However what did Biden say about these notebooks in his interview with Hur? He lied:
MR KRICKBAUM: If I perceive your final reply, Mr President, a part of what you're saying is, for instance, if these notebooks have been full of marked categorised paperwork, have been you not conscious of that?
President Biden: Proper.
That reply can be related to a different query from Particular Counsel Hur. Hur uncovered proof that categorised paperwork have been moved inside Biden's house – one thing that will have occurred after Biden grew to become vice chairman. Requested whether or not he obtained something with categorised markings after turning into vice chairman, Biden responded:
“I don't recall receiving something that had a categorised image on it after I grew to become Vice President.”
Biden was additionally requested about statements he made to his ghostwriter relating to categorised paperwork. He stated he didn’t keep in mind telling his ghostwriter that he had “bought all of the marked categorised stuff down there.”
As a substitute, Biden tried to dismiss that assertion by explaining with out prompting that “categorised” means “off the report.”
“It was confidential. I didn't try this – not confidential within the sense of classification, however don't try this, don't write about that. That’s off the report. It's not one thing I need to discuss within the guide about Beau.”
As we wrap up, Hur is already testifying. And the Democrats, in line with what they did to John Durham, are twisting his findings and attacking his character. We don't count on any revelations from Hur's testimony (we hope we're incorrect about this). All of the juice is within the reviews and transcripts (a few of which nonetheless must be launched).