[
San Francisco made historical past in 2019 when its Board of Supervisors voted to ban metropolis companies, together with the police division, from utilizing facial recognition. Practically two dozen different American cities have adopted go well with. However San Francisco voters on Tuesday turned in opposition to the concept of limiting police know-how and supported a poll proposal that might make it simpler for metropolis police to deploy drones and different surveillance gear.
Proposition E handed with 60 % of the vote and was supported by San Francisco Mayor London Breed. It provides the San Francisco Police Division new freedom to put in public security cameras and deploy drones with out the oversight of town's Police Fee or Board of Supervisors. It additionally reduces the requirement that the SFPD get hold of approval from the Board of Supervisors earlier than adopting new surveillance know-how, permitting approval to be sought at any time throughout the first yr.
Matt Cagle, a senior workers legal professional for the ACLU of Northern California, says these adjustments raise current restrictions on facial recognition, however loosen different vital protections. “We’re involved that Proposition E will end in individuals in San Francisco being uncovered to unproven and harmful know-how,” he says. “This can be a reprehensible try by highly effective pursuits to use worry about crime and switch extra energy to the police.”
Mayor Breed and different supporters have positioned it as a response to issues about crime in San Francisco. Crime figures have broadly declined, however fentanyl has just lately elevated overdose deaths and industrial downtown neighborhoods are nonetheless battling pandemic-induced workplace and retail vacancies. The proposal was additionally backed by tech trade teams, together with marketing campaign group GroSF, which didn’t reply to a request for remark.
Mayor Breed stated in a press release, “By supporting the work of our cops, increasing our use of know-how and bringing officers out of behind their desks and onto our streets, we’re persevering with our mission to make San Francisco a safer metropolis. Will proceed.” move movement. Whereas town noticed its lowest crime charges in a decade in 2023 — barring a pandemic in 2020 — property crime and violent crime charges will proceed to say no additional in 2024, he stated.
Proposition E provides police extra freedom to pursue suspects in automobile chases and reduces paperwork obligations, which additionally permits officers to resort to make use of of drive.
Caitlin Seely George, managing director and campaigns director of Battle for the Future, a nonprofit that has lengthy campaigned in opposition to using facial recognition, calls the proposal “a blow to hard-fought reforms” which might be at stake. San Francisco has championed the reins lately. below remark.”
“By rising using surveillance know-how by police, in addition to lowering surveillance and transparency, it undermines individuals's rights and can create situations the place individuals shall be at higher threat of hurt,” says George.
Though the ACLU's Cagle shares his issues that San Francisco's residents shall be much less secure, he says town should retain its fame to catalyze a US-wide pushback in opposition to surveillance. Practically two dozen different cities additionally added new oversight mechanisms for police surveillance following San Francisco's 2019 facial recognition ban.